Why Study the Enuma Elish Today?
Among all texts from ancient Mesopotamia — cradle of empires, cities, and the first forms of writing — none is as famous and debated as the Enuma Elish, the Babylonian epic of creation.
For Bible scholars, archaeologists, Christians, and those interested in ancient history, the Enuma Elish is important for a simple reason:
It's the most cited text when claiming that "Genesis copied pagan myths."
But it's also one of the texts that most helps confirm the theological uniqueness of Genesis.
Therefore, studying the Enuma Elish from a biblical and academic perspective is essential for anyone who wants to understand:
What Is the Enuma Elish?
The Enuma Elish is a Babylonian creation epic, written in Akkadian and recorded on seven tablets found mainly in the library of Ashurbanipal (Nineveh), dated to the 7th century BC, although the composition is much older — approximately between 1800–1600 BC.
Its title "Enuma Elish" means:
"When on high..." (The opening words of tablet 1)
It describes:
- the birth of the gods,
- a divine war,
- the ascension of Marduk as supreme god,
- and the creation of the world and man from the corpse of a goddess.
Where Was the Enuma Elish Found?
The main tablets were excavated by Austen Henry Layard and Hormuzd Rassam in the 19th century, in the ruins of ancient Nineveh, in Ashurbanipal's palace.
Additional discoveries came from:
- Ashur,
- Babylon,
- Kish,
- and other Mesopotamian cities.
Today they are scattered in:
- British Museum (London),
- Istanbul Museum,
- Berlin Museum,
- and academic collections.
The discovery of the Enuma Elish was a milestone in biblical archaeology history, because:
For the first time, the world saw an "ancient creation account" predating the final edition of Genesis.
And Bible critics used this to say that "the Bible copied the Babylonian myth."
But as we'll see, this conclusion is superficial and ignorant in the face of serious analysis.
How the Enuma Elish Functioned in Babylonian Religion
In Babylon, the Enuma Elish wasn't just literature — it was a liturgical text, used in the great New Year's festival called:
Akitu
During the festival:
- priests recited the text aloud,
- Marduk's statue was carried through the streets,
- purification and submission rituals took place,
- the king prostrated himself before Marduk,
- royal authority was symbolically renewed.
In other words:
The Enuma Elish politically and religiously justified the supremacy of Marduk and Babylon itself.
It's a text of religious and nationalist propaganda.
The Plot of the Enuma Elish
I'll summarize in an orderly way to make the contrast with Genesis clear:
5.1 The Birth of the Gods
First, nothing exists — only primordial waters divided into:
- Apsu (masculine freshwater)
- Tiamat (feminine saltwater)
They mix and generate a series of younger gods.
5.2 The Divine War
The younger gods make too much noise. Apsu wants to kill them. Tiamat is against it, but later changes her mind and creates monsters.
The gods, terrified, seek a hero.
Young Marduk offers to fight, with one condition:
"If I win, I will be the supreme god."
5.3 Marduk's Victory
After an epic battle, Marduk defeats Tiamat:
- opens her body in two,
- with one half creates the sky,
- with the other half creates the earth.
5.4 The Creation of Man
Man is made from:
- the blood of Kingu (Tiamat's consort),
- mixed with clay,
For what purpose?
To serve the gods. So that the lesser gods don't have to work.
5.5 The Establishment of Babylon
The final act exalts Babylon as a divine city, and Marduk as sovereign of the cosmos.
Why Did the Enuma Elish Exist?
Academics are unanimous:
✦ The Enuma Elish is NOT a "scientific explanation" of creation.
✦ It's a religious piece with three functions:
1. Justify Marduk's supremacy He defeats Tiamat → becomes king of the gods.
2. Justify Babylon's supremacy The city is the "center of the universe."
3. Subordinate man Humanity exists to serve the gods as slaves.
This vision violently contrasts with Genesis. And this is where we begin to enter apologetic territory.
Fundamental Difference Between Enuma Elish and Genesis
You'll notice that:
Despite superficial similarities (water, division, creation, etc.) the purpose, theology, language, and worldview are totally different.
Genesis is:
- monotheistic,
- ethical,
- without sexual mythology,
- without violence between gods,
- without personified chaos,
- without cosmic war.
And presents a God:
- unique,
- eternal,
- sovereign,
- moral,
- creator without rival.
The Enuma Elish, on the other hand, is:
- polytheistic,
- violent,
- mythological,
- sexualized,
- politicized,
- nationalistic.
There's no serious comparison between the two.
The Theology of the Enuma Elish and How It Contrasts with Genesis
In this part, we'll enter the "heart" of the Enuma Elish: its worldview, its theology, its spiritual and political purpose, and what this reveals about Babylonian religious thought — to then directly contrast it with Genesis.
The goal here is to show why the Bible cannot have been derived from this myth, even though both exist in the same "literary environment" of the Near East.
The Babylonian Worldview: The Universe as Battlefield
The first fundamental characteristic of the Enuma Elish is the worldview:
The cosmos is born from chaos, violence, and war between gods.
There is no natural order. There is no moral purpose. There is no good versus evil. There is only:
- force,
- conflict,
- power,
- magic,
- domination.
Tiamat, the goddess of chaos, represents the "primordial ocean." The world only exists because Marduk kills her and uses her corpse as raw material.
This is crucial to understanding Babylonian theology:
- The universe is the result of conflict.
- Creation is accidental and violent.
- The world is under constant threat of returning to chaos.
This thought is called by scholars:
Conflict cosmogony (cosmos + gonos = origin; conflict as cause)
This vision is totally anti-biblical, as we'll see next.
The Theology of the Enuma Elish: Unstable and Morally Weak Gods
The Enuma Elish presents gods that:
- are born,
- fight,
- lie,
- betray,
- change moods,
- die,
- can be defeated.
From a theological point of view:
- They are not eternal.
- They are not sovereign.
- They are not moral.
- They are not creators "by essence."
They are part of the cosmos, not its Creator.
They emerge after the primordial waters, not before.
The biblical world is exactly the opposite.
The Creation of Humanity in the Enuma Elish: Slaves of the Gods
Here's one of the most shocking points:
Man is created as a slave. Made to relieve the lesser gods of their tasks.
The key phrase from tablet VI says:
"Let us create man to bear the burden."
Man exists to:
- serve,
- work,
- obey,
- sustain temples,
- feed the gods.
In other words:
- Humanity is not loved.
- Humanity has no inherent dignity.
- Humanity is a tool.
The Enuma Elish reveals a profoundly utilitarian view of the human being.
And this will brutally contrast with Genesis.
The Political Objective of the Enuma Elish: Exalt Babylon and Marduk
No serious scholar considers the Enuma Elish merely a religious myth. It is simultaneously:
- a political manifesto,
- an instrument of ideological control,
- nationalist propaganda.
Because if Marduk is the king of the gods...
...then the king of Babylon is his earthly representative.
This link between "celestial king" and "earthly king" is the foundation of Babylonian monarchy.
The people believed that:
- their nation was the center of the universe,
- their city was chosen by the gods,
- their capital was literally the "navel of the world."
This nationalist theology is typical of the Near East. And Genesis will completely subvert this.
Structural Comparison: Enuma Elish vs Genesis 1–2
Now comes the most anticipated part of the article: the literary and theological comparison between the texts.
Here's a clear comparative table:
| Enuma Elish | Genesis |
|---|---|
| Polytheistic | Absolute monotheism |
| Gods are born and die | God is eternal, without origin |
| Creation arises from chaos and violence | Creation is intentional order |
| Universe is product of war | Universe born from rational command ("Let there be...") |
| Humanity serves the gods | Humanity is God's image |
| Man made from blood of murdered god | Man formed with dignity |
| Creation is accidental byproduct | Creation is good |
| No universal morality | Speaks of morality, ethics, and purpose |
| Text purpose: exalt Babylon | Text purpose: reveal God |
| Time linked to Marduk's festivals | Time linked to Sabbath, not pagan festivals |
Fundamental Theological Differences
Let's now explore, point by point:
13.1 God vs. Gods
Genesis: "In the beginning, God created..." (One God, personal, eternal, sovereign)
Enuma Elish: Gods are born from chaos, fight, and one wins by force.
Conclusion: These are irreconcilable worldviews.
13.2 Creation by Word vs. Creation by Violence
Genesis: "And God said: let there be light." Creation is word, reason, order.
Enuma Elish: Marduk tears Tiamat apart and makes the world from her body.
Conclusion: Genesis describes a rational and intentional universe. The Enuma Elish describes an irrational and conflictual universe.
13.3 Human Dignity vs. Human Slavery
Genesis: "Let us make man in our image." Humanity has intrinsic value.
Enuma Elish: "Let us create man to bear the burden." Humanity exists to serve fragile gods.
Conclusion: There's no way to equate these anthropologies.
13.4 The Role of the Cosmos
Genesis presents:
- order,
- purpose,
- goodness,
- balance.
Enuma Elish presents:
- chaos,
- violence,
- instability,
- fear.
13.5 Morality
Genesis introduces:
- right and wrong,
- moral responsibility,
- good creation,
- responsible humanity.
The Enuma Elish has no morality. The gods are not good or just — they are powerful.
The Modern Critical Argument: "Genesis Copied the Enuma Elish"
This claim — repeated in blogs, TV documentaries, and superficial classes — is profoundly mistaken.
Serious comparison shows that:
- theology is different,
- language is different,
- structure is different,
- purpose is different,
- worldview is different.
The few similarities are:
- primordial water,
- separation processes,
- creation of man,
- cosmic order,
...but this is exactly what we would expect from any culture trying to explain the world's creation.
Superficial similarity is not literary dependence.
The Final Question: Why Is Genesis So Different?
The theological answer: Because Genesis doesn't arise from Babylonian theology, but from divine revelation to the people of Israel.
The academic answer: Because Genesis represents an unprecedented theological revolution in the Near East.
The historical answer: Because Israel developed a monotheistic, ethical, and spiritual worldview, in contrast to all neighboring religions.
The spiritual answer: Because while the Enuma Elish attempts to explain Babylon's power, Genesis attempts to reveal God's character.